This offering is not approved or endorsed by Silicon Graphics International Corp.,
the producer of the OpenFOAM® software and owner of the OpenFOAM® trade mark.
top
logo


Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.  Lost Password?
Special Interest Group on Ship Hydrodynamics Group Forum: Ship Hydro SIG covers all aspects of CFD simulation of ships and ship systems. As a group, it intersects with the Turbomachinery SIG, the Turbulence Modeling SIG, and the Multiphase and Free-Surface SIG.
Go to bottomPage: 1
TOPIC: moving domain vs. fluctuating flow
#197
moving domain vs. fluctuating flow 11 Months, 1 Week ago Karma: 0
Dear Foamers,

I am performing some 2D simulations with fluctuating flow in a channel with an obstacle inside. What I do is having a fixed domain (the channel flow with the obstacle attached on the lower wall) with a timeVaryingUniformFixedValueBC at the inlet & outlet for the velocity. So far I performed my analyses using pimpleFoam and turbFoam.

Now I want to do something different. I don't want to use a fluctuating flow anymore as BC but I want to move the whole domain with a fluctuating velocity (same as flow velocity). Please note I don't want any deformation of the mesh.


Questions are:

which solver is optimal for this application?

Which boundary condition is required to simulate the motion of the whole domain?

Is there any example available which is similar to what I need?


Looking forward to your feedback,
Alessio
Alessio Pistidda
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 5
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#198
Re:moving domain vs. fluctuating flow 11 Months, 1 Week ago Karma: 0
Here's a Sample Case Setup.

I use a solid body motion function. That's generally the way to move the mesh without any deformation. This function is defined in constant/dynamicMeshDict.

Use movingWallVelocity on the moving wall to set no slip. Otherwise things are pretty standard.

The solver is pimpleDyMFoam, but you could use interDyMFoam if you have a free surface flow.
File Attachment:
File Name: pimpleCase.gz
File Size: 995887
Alton Luder III
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 3
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#199
Re:moving domain vs. fluctuating flow 11 Months, 1 Week ago Karma: 0
And here's the custom solidBodyMotionFunction. You'll have to modify it if you want to specify a function that isn't native.

Its made for OpenFOAM®-1.6-ext, but it should compile without problems on 1.7.x. You're on your own for OpenFOAM®-2.0
File Attachment:
File Name: luderSolidBodyMotionFvMesh.gz
File Size: 63931
Alton Luder III
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 3
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#201
Re:moving domain vs. fluctuating flow 11 Months ago Karma: 0
Thanks Alton! It works perfectly. One more thing. If I want to apply a generic motion to the domain reading a data file (1 direction only is sufficient), is there any BC for that?

Cheers,
Alessio
Alessio Pistidda
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 5
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
#202
Re:moving domain vs. fluctuating flow 11 Months ago Karma: 0
Hi Alessio,

yes it is possible, look at timeVaryingUniformFixedValue BC

Regards

Norman
Norman Del Puppo
Fresh Boarder
Posts: 1
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Go to topPage: 1
Joomla SEO powered by JoomSEF


bottom
top

OpenFOAM®-Extend World

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

bottom
Legal | Imprint
©Copyright 2012 The OpenFOAM® Extend Project 

Powered by Joomla! Designed by Joomla Templates, ecommerce web hosting, Thanks to J! Developer Goran Gligorin for support! Joomla SEF URLs by Artio. Powered by Staff Master v0.9.8 Valid: XHTML and CSS

Friends Online